点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
【新时代新征程新伟业】贵州贵阳：让幸福感在家门口“升级”******
中新网贵阳12月15日电 题：贵州贵阳：让幸福感在家门口“升级”
记者张雷 张伟 杨茜
冬日清晨，贵州省贵阳市南明区南横街片区的老住户游老先生站在楼下观望着施工人员对居民楼的改造。“你们是北京来的啊！我和你说我们这里的变化可大了，5年前又脏又乱，现在都成了小花园，每天人来人往好热闹的。”面对记者的询问，游老先生满面笑容地讲起南横街的变化，并邀约记者待改造完成后再来看看他们的闲适生活。
12月6日，贵阳市南横街内的居民区。 瞿宏伦 摄背街小巷是城市的脉络，记录着城市的历史，也承载着民众家门口的幸福感。贵阳市正把背街小巷升级改造当作一项实实在在的民生工程扎实推进，在扮靓城市颜值的同时，不断完善提升区域城市功能，让民众的幸福“看得见、摸得着”。
12月6日，贵阳市南横街内的各类美食店。“搬走又搬回”的南横街31号社区年过七旬的赵桂芬阿姨对于南横街的变化感触很深，“我曾因为环境太差而选择搬家，后看到改造后的新环境又搬回来。”
12月6日，市民在贵阳市南横街购买美食。 瞿宏伦 摄“以前只要下雨，楼下的污水四处流淌，根本没有可以走人的地方。现在好了，就算是大暴雨，路面也不会有积水，还是干干净净的”。赵桂芬对媒体说，现在楼下还有了娱乐休闲区，闲暇时候她会带着孙女到楼下玩耍，“和老朋友们聊聊天、打打牌，感觉很惬意。”
12月6日，市民经过贵阳市南横街浮雕墙。 瞿宏伦 摄赵桂芬口中惬意的生活得益于背街小巷的改造。贵阳市推行的城市“一圈两场三改”，进一步提升了居民生活幸福感。“一圈两场三改”是贵阳围绕民众在“教业文卫体，老幼食住行”十个方面，解决民众急难愁盼、补齐民生短板的一项民生工程，包括打造15分钟生活圈、建好停车场和农贸市场、加快推进棚户区、老旧小区和背街小巷改造。
11月22日，中新社副总编辑张雷在贵阳市南横街片区城市更新项目现场采访居民。 瞿宏伦 摄民为邦本，本固邦宁。贵阳官方表示，推进“一圈两场三改”是贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署的必然要求；贯彻落实省委、省政府“强省会”五年行动战略决策部署的重大举措；切实改善民生的迫切需要；是提升贵阳市城市品质的当务之急；促进经济社会高质量发展重要抓手。
12月6日，市民在贵阳市南横街闲逛。 瞿宏伦 摄自推进“一圈两场三改”建设以来，贵阳已实现“15分钟生活圈”全面覆盖，民众生活更加便利；“停车场、农超市场”扎实推进，民众生活更加便捷；棚改、旧改、背改“三改”深入实施，民众居住环境显著提升。
12月6日，位于贵阳市南横街片区的省级文物保护单位(王伯群故居)。 瞿宏伦 摄数据显示，截至目前，贵阳已启动99个“15分钟生活圈”、2039个项目建设；已新增公共停车位44057个，投用率97.9%；已改造提升完成农贸市场60个，完成优化调整惠民生鲜超市门店网点14个；170个棚户区改造项目启动签约，累计签约10.9万户；已改造完成5.9万户老旧小区改造，完成率65.6%；已改造完成755条背街小巷，完工率87.8%。
官方表示，贵阳将按照“强省会”中强民生的决策部署，聚焦规划主导、清单主责、群众主体、基层主治，高质量推进“一圈两场三改”工作。
12月6日，市民在贵阳市南横街内的休闲长廊中聊天。 瞿宏伦 摄采访结束时，记者道别巷子里的居民们，“现在正在升级改造中，我们的社区会更美，欢迎你们来做客。”游老先生热情地话音在微雨的冬天清晨街巷里传得很远很远。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)